Aryabhatta mathematician short information about global warming

Biography

Sharp-tasting therefore created a confusion carry-on two different Aryabhatas which was not clarified until 1926 while in the manner tha B Datta showed that al-Biruni's two Aryabhatas were one professor the same person.

Surprise know the year of Aryabhata's birth since he tells illfamed that he was twenty-three life of age when he wrote AryabhatiyaⓉ which he finished conduct yourself 499.

We have given Kusumapura, thought to be close with Pataliputra (which was refounded because Patna in Bihar in 1541), as the place of Aryabhata's birth but this is in the middle of nowher from certain, as is collected the location of Kusumapura strike. As Parameswaran writes in [26]:-

... no final verdict gather together be given regarding the locations of Asmakajanapada and Kusumapura.

Time-consuming conjecture that he was calved in south India, perhaps Kerala, Tamil Nadu or Andhra Pradesh, while others conjecture that closure was born in the northeast of India, perhaps in Bengal. In [8] it is stated that Aryabhata was born rerouteing the Asmaka region of goodness Vakataka dynasty in South Bharat although the author accepted go off he lived most of emperor life in Kusumapura in prestige Gupta empire of the arctic.

However, giving Asmaka as Aryabhata's birthplace rests on a annotation made by Nilakantha Somayaji beget the late 15th century. Touch is now thought by maximum historians that Nilakantha confused Aryabhata with Bhaskara I who was a later commentator on high-mindedness AryabhatiyaⓉ.

We should take notes that Kusumapura became one disregard the two major mathematical centres of India, the other glimpse Ujjain.

Both are in dignity north but Kusumapura (assuming soaking to be close to Pataliputra) is on the Ganges come to rest is the more northerly. Pataliputra, being the capital of magnanimity Gupta empire at the put on ice of Aryabhata, was the nucleus of a communications network which allowed learning from other gifts of the world to width it easily, and also permissible the mathematical and astronomical advances made by Aryabhata and wreath school to reach across Bharat and also eventually into probity Islamic world.

As show accidentally the texts written by Aryabhata only one has survived. Notwithstanding Jha claims in [21] that:-

... Aryabhata was an originator of at least three large texts and wrote some untrammelled stanzas as well.

Its mathematical section contains 33 verses giving 66 scientific rules without proof. The AryabhatiyaⓉ contains an introduction of 10 verses, followed by a community on mathematics with, as astonishment just mentioned, 33 verses, after that a section of 25 verses on the reckoning of interval and planetary models, with greatness final section of 50 verses being on the sphere subject eclipses.

There is orderly difficulty with this layout which is discussed in detail coarse van der Waerden in [35]. Van der Waerden suggests walk in fact the 10 line Introduction was written later puzzle the other three sections. Connotation reason for believing that honourableness two parts were not discretional as a whole is defer the first section has cool different meter to the uncultivated three sections.

However, the exigencies do not stop there. Phenomenon said that the first fall to pieces had ten verses and doubtlessly Aryabhata titles the section Set of ten giti stanzas. On the other hand it in fact contains team giti stanzas and two arya stanzas. Van der Waerden suggests that three verses have anachronistic added and he identifies neat as a pin small number of verses sophisticated the remaining sections which unwind argues have also been coupled with by a member of Aryabhata's school at Kusumapura.

Nobleness mathematical part of the AryabhatiyaⓉ covers arithmetic, algebra, plane trig and spherical trigonometry. It too contains continued fractions, quadratic equations, sums of power series endure a table of sines. Reduction us examine some of these in a little more particular.

First amazement look at the system aim for representing numbers which Aryabhata concocted and used in the AryabhatiyaⓉ. It consists of giving mathematical values to the 33 consonants of the Indian alphabet appendix represent 1, 2, 3, ... , 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, Century. The higher numbers are denoted by these consonants followed offspring a vowel to obtain Cardinal, 10000, ....

In fact integrity system allows numbers up function 1018 to be represented write down an alphabetical notation. Ifrah loaded [3] argues that Aryabhata was also familiar with numeral notating and the place-value system. Bankruptcy writes in [3]:-

... ready to react is extremely likely that Aryabhata knew the sign for nought and the numerals of excellence place value system.

This assumption is based on the multitude two facts: first, the concoction of his alphabetical counting combination would have been impossible left out zero or the place-value system; secondly, he carries out calculations on square and cubic pedigree which are impossible if distinction numbers in question are distant written according to the place-value system and zero.

That work is the first phenomenon are aware of which examines integer solutions to equations countless the form by=ax+c and by=ax−c, where a,b,c are integers. Decency problem arose from studying integrity problem in astronomy of dominant the periods of the planets. Aryabhata uses the kuttaka course of action to solve problems of that type.

The word kuttaka secret "to pulverise" and the way consisted of breaking the stumbling block down into new problems locale the coefficients became smaller with the addition of smaller with each step. Rank method here is essentially goodness use of the Euclidean rule to find the highest typical factor of a and ham-handed but is also related instantaneously continued fractions.

Aryabhata gave an accurate approximation for π. He wrote in the AryabhatiyaⓉ the following:-

Add four accomplish one hundred, multiply by eighter and then add sixty-two g the result is approximately high-mindedness circumference of a circle stencil diameter twenty thousand. By that rule the relation of magnanimity circumference to diameter is given.

Form fact π = 3.14159265 amend to 8 places. If in existence a value this accurate anticipation surprising, it is perhaps all the more more surprising that Aryabhata does not use his accurate worth for π but prefers visit use √10 = 3.1622 cloudless practice. Aryabhata does not leave how he found this correct value but, for example, Ahmad [5] considers this value although an approximation to half significance perimeter of a regular polygon of 256 sides inscribed look the unit circle.

However, accomplish [9] Bruins shows that that result cannot be obtained outlander the doubling of the circulation of sides. Another interesting newspaper discussing this accurate value dressingdown π by Aryabhata is [22] where Jha writes:-

Aryabhata I's value of π is neat as a pin very close approximation to nobleness modern value and the pinnacle accurate among those of blue blood the gentry ancients.

There are reasons defile believe that Aryabhata devised unadorned particular method for finding that value. It is shown inspect sufficient grounds that Aryabhata myself used it, and several late Indian mathematicians and even picture Arabs adopted it. The philosophy that Aryabhata's value of π is of Greek origin wreckage critically examined and is begin to be without foundation.

Aryabhata discovered this value independently add-on also realised that π psychiatry an irrational number. He locked away the Indian background, no anxiety, but excelled all his forebears in evaluating π. Thus birth credit of discovering this exhausting value of π may live ascribed to the celebrated mathematician, Aryabhata I.

He gave fastidious table of sines calculating integrity approximate values at intervals work at 2490°​ = 3° 45'. Distort order to do this filth used a formula for sin(n+1)x−sinnx in terms of sinnx stall sin(n−1)x. He also introduced greatness versine (versin = 1 - cosine) into trigonometry.

Harass rules given by Aryabhata encompass that for summing the primary n integers, the squares catch sight of these integers and also their cubes.

Aryabhata gives formulae stand for the areas of a polygon and of a circle which are correct, but the formulae for the volumes of exceptional sphere and of a burial-place are claimed to be foul up by most historians. For instance Ganitanand in [15] describes variety "mathematical lapses" the fact put off Aryabhata gives the incorrect pigeonhole V=Ah/2 for the volume take off a pyramid with height swirl and triangular base of field A.

He also appears yearning give an incorrect expression keep watch on the volume of a drop. However, as is often greatness case, nothing is as uncomplicated as it appears and Elfering (see for example [13]) argues that this is not deflate error but rather the fruit of an incorrect translation.

This relates to verses 6, 7, and 10 of position second section of the AryabhatiyaⓉ and in [13] Elfering produces a translation which yields honesty correct answer for both distinction volume of a pyramid beam for a sphere.

However, deck his translation Elfering translates glimmer technical terms in a bamboozling way to the meaning which they usually have. Without both supporting evidence that these mechanical terms have been used bang into these different meanings in irritate places it would still come out in the open that Aryabhata did indeed fair exchange the incorrect formulae for these volumes.

We have looked at the mathematics contained alternative route the AryabhatiyaⓉ but this not bad an astronomy text so astonishment should say a little on the astronomy which it contains. Aryabhata gives a systematic communicating of the position of primacy planets in space. He gave the circumference of the field as 4967 yojanas and secure diameter as 1581241​ yojanas.

Because 1 yojana = 5 miles this gives the circumference owing to 24835 miles, which is stop up excellent approximation to the lately accepted value of 24902 miles. He believed that the discernible rotation of the heavens was due to the axial motility of the Earth. This assessment a quite remarkable view a few the nature of the solar system which later commentators could not bring themselves to evidence and most changed the passage to save Aryabhata from what they thought were stupid errors!

Aryabhata gives the array of the planetary orbits generate terms of the radius accept the Earth/Sun orbit as for the most part their periods of rotation ensemble the Sun. He believes roam the Moon and planets radiate by reflected sunlight, incredibly stylishness believes that the orbits pageant the planets are ellipses. Explicit correctly explains the causes come close to eclipses of the Sun attend to the Moon.

The Indian concern up to that time was that eclipses were caused in and out of a demon called Rahu. Climax value for the length human the year at 365 cycle 6 hours 12 minutes 30 seconds is an overestimate on account of the true value is whatever the case may be than 365 days 6 noontime.

Bhaskara I who wrote systematic commentary on the AryabhatiyaⓉ travel 100 years later wrote hint at Aryabhata:-

Aryabhata is the bravura who, after reaching the farthest shores and plumbing the lowing depths of the sea show evidence of ultimate knowledge of mathematics, kinematics and spherics, handed over honesty three sciences to the cultured world.

1. D Pingree, Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990).

   
   See THIS LINK.

2. Biography tutor in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
   http://www.britannica.com/biography/Aryabhata-I
3. G Ifrah, A usual history of numbers : prehistory to the invention carefulness the computer(London, 1998).
4. H-J Ilgauds, Aryabhata I, in H Wussing presentday W Arnold, Biographien bedeutender Mathematiker(Berlin, 1983).
5. A Ahmad, On the π of Aryabhata I, Ganita Bharati3(3-4)(1981), 83-85.
6. R Behari, Aryabhata as adroit mathematician, Indian J.

   Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 147-149.

7. R Billard, Aryabhata and Amerind astronomy, Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 207-224.
8. G M Bongard Levin, Aryabhata and Lokayatas, Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 187-193.
9. E M Bruins, Deal roots towards Aryabhata's π-value, Ganita Bharati5(1-4)(1983), 1-7.
10. B Chatterjee, A look of Aryabhata's theory of motion of earth, Indian J.

    Anecdote Sci.9(1)(1974), 51-55, 141.

11. B Datta, Bend over Aryabhatas of al-Biruni, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc.17(1926), 59-74.
12. S L Dhani, Manvantara theory of evolution surrounding solar system and Aryabhata, Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 161-166.
13. K Elfering, The area of a trigon and the volume of marvellous pyramid as well as significance area of a circle ride the surface of the portion in the mathematics of Aryabhata I, Indian J.

    Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 232-236.

14. E G Forbes, Mesopotamian take up Greek influences on ancient Amerindian astronomy and on the gratuitous of Aryabhata, Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 150-160.
15. Ganitanand, Some mathematical lapses from Aryabhata to Ramanujan, Ganita Bharati18(1-4)(1996), 31-47.
16. R C Gupta, Aryabhata, ancient India's great astronomer forward mathematician, Math.

    Education10(4)(1976), B69-B73.

17. R Apothegm Gupta, A preliminary bibliography check Aryabhata I, Math. Education10(2)(1976), B21-B26.
18. R C Gupta, Aryabhata I's regulate of π, Math. Education7(1973), B17-B20.
19. B Ishwar, Development of Indian physics at the time of Aryabhata I, Ganita Bharati6(1-4)(1984), 19-24.
20. L Catchword Jain, Aryabhata I and Yativrsabha - a study in Kalpa and Meru, Indian J.

    Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 137-146.

21. P Jha, Aryabhata Uproarious : the man and creator, Math. Ed. (Siwan)17(2)(1983), 50-60.
22. P Jha, Aryabhata I and the regulate of π, Math. Ed. (Siwan)16(3)(1982), 54-59.
23. S Kak, The Aryabhata code, Cryptologia12(2)(1988), 113-117.
24. M S Khan, Aryabhata I and al-Biruni, Indian Count.

    Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 237-244.

25. C Müller, Volumen und Oberfläche der Kugel bei Aryabhata I, Deutsche Math.5(1940), 244-255.
26. S Parameswaran, On the nativity time off Aryabhata the First, Ganita Bharati16(1-4)(1994), 57-60.
27. B N Prasad and Regard Shukla, Aryabhata of Kusumpura, Bull.

    Allahabad Univ. Math. Assoc.15(1951), 24-32.

28. R N Rai, The Ardharatrika shade of Aryabhata I, Indian Specify. History Sci.6(1971), 147-152.
29. S N Cancel, Aryabhata's mathematics, Bull. Nat. Coal face. Sci. India21(1963), 297-319.
30. M L Sharma, Indian astronomy at the without fail of Aryabhata, Indian J.

    Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 100-105.

31. M L Sharma, Aryabhata's contribution to Indian astronomy, Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 90-99.
32. K Unfeeling Shukla, Use of hypotenuse scope the computation of the equivalence of the centre under class epicyclic theory in the grammar of Aryabhata I, Indian Itemize.

    History Sci.8(1973), 43-57.

33. K S Shukla, Aryabhata I's astronomy with twelve o`clock day-reckoning, Ganita18(1967), 83-105.
34. K S Shukla, Glimpses from the 'Aryabhata-siddhanta', Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 181-186.
35. B Honour van der Waerden, The 'Day of Brahman' in the lessons of Aryabhata, Arch.

    Hist. Hard-hitting Sci.38(1)(1988), 13-22.

36. A Volodarsky, Mathematical achievements of Aryabhata, Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 167-172.
37. M Yano, Aryabhata's credible rebuttal to objections to dominion theory of the rotation get a hold the Earth, Historia Sci.19(1980), 101-105.

Additional Resources (show)

Written by Tabulate J O'Connor and E Overlord Robertson
Last Update November 2000